Infection Control Practices in Assisted Living Facilities: A Response to Hepatitis B Virus Infection Outbreaks
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 30 (3) , 209-214
- https://doi.org/10.1086/595693
Abstract
Background.: The medical needs of the approximately 1 million persons residing in assisted living facilities (ALFs) continually become more demanding. Moreover, the number of ALF residents is expected to double by 2030. ALFs are not subject to federal oversight; state regulations that govern ALF infection control are variable. In 2005, two outbreaks of acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in ALFs in Virginia were associated with sharing fingerstick devices used in blood glucose monitoring.Objective.: To characterize infection control practices, determine compliance with guidelines, and identify educational and policy needs in ALFs in Virginia.Methods.: Following the outbreaks of HBV infection, educational packets were sent to ALFs in Virginia to inform them of infection control guidelines and recommendations regarding glucose monitoring. A follow-up survey consisting of on-site interviews was conducted in a random sample of ALFs. Differences among infection control practices, according to the size and ownership of the ALFs, were assessed.Results.: Fifty of 155 ALFs in central Virginia were surveyed. Of the 45 ALFs that had used fingerstick devices, 7 (16%) had shared these devices (without cleaning) between residents. Sharing practices for glucose monitoring equipment did not differ by facility size or ownership. Of all 50 ALFs, 17 (34%) did not offer employees HBV vaccine. HBV vaccine was less frequently offered at ALFs that had fewer than 50 residents, compared with ALFs with at least 50 residents (P< .01), and HBV vaccine was less frequently offered at ALFs that were individually owned, compared with those that were not individually owned (P= .02).Conclusions.: Despite outreach and long-standing recommendations, approximately 1 in 6 facilities shared fingerstick devices, and more than one-third of ALFs surveyed were considered noncompliant with federal guidelines (Occupational Safety and Health Administration Bloodborne Pathogens Standard). Public health and licensing agencies should work with ALFs to implement infection control measures and prevent disease transmission.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing State Immunization Requirements for Healthcare Workers and PatientsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007
- Infection control program disparities between acute and long-term care facilities in MarylandAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2006
- Multicenter Study of the Prevalence of Blood Contamination on Point-of-Care Glucose Meters and Recommendations for Controlling ContaminationPoint of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology, 2005
- Assisted Living and Nursing Homes: Apples and Oranges?The Gerontologist, 2003
- Nosocomial Transmission of Hepatitis B Virus Infection Among Residents with Diabetes in a Skilled Nursing FacilityInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2002
- Effect of a comprehensive infection control program on the incidence of infections in long-term care facilitiesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2000
- Deja vu: nosocomial hepatitis B virus transmission and fingerstick monitoringThe American Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Infection Prevention and Control in the Long-Term-Care FacilityInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1997
- Infection Prevention and Control in the Long-Term-Care FacilityInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1997