EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS URETEROSCOPY FOR DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 162 (6) , 1909-1912
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68066-4
Abstract
Purpose: We performed a prospective randomized study to determine appropriate first line treatment for distal ureteral stones. Material and Methods: Between January 1996 and October 1997, 80 patients with distal ureteral stones (40 smaller than 5 mm. and 40 larger than 5 mm.) were randomized and treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy with a 9.5 or 6.5F semirigid ureteroscope. Results: Ureteroscopy was significantly better in terms of operative time, fluoroscopy time and time to achieve a stone-free state. The smaller the stones, the greater the difference between the 2 treatment modalities. Conclusions: For distal ureteral stones we recommend ureteroscopy as first line treatment.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ureteroscopy for lower ureteral stonesUrology, 1993
- Cost and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Lower Ureteral CalculiJournal of Urology, 1992
- Treatment Options for Ureteral Calculi: Endourology or Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1991
- Ureteral Calculi: Natural History and Treatment in an Era of Advanced TechnologyJournal of Urology, 1991
- In SituESWL ν Ureteroscopy: The Case for Ureteroscopy*Journal of Endourology, 1989
- Primary Choice of Intervention for Distal Ureteric Stone: Ureteroscopy or ESWL?British Journal of Urology, 1988
- Treatment of Prevesical Ureteral Calculi by Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1988
- UreteroscopyJournal of Urology, 1988
- Ureteral Stone Management: Emerging ConceptsJournal of Urology, 1986
- Early Experience with Direct Vision Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy of Ureteral CalculiJournal of Urology, 1985