Growth Management Concern
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Behavior
- Vol. 18 (6) , 707-732
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916586186002
Abstract
This article extends research reported by Van Liere and Dunlap (1981) by analyzing the degree to which support for controlling local population growth is affected by how growth controls are defined. Specifically, growth management concern is distinguished by general and specific definitions, with the latter including support for specific growth policies and support for growth controls in the face of explicit costs. The article examines how these definitions of growth management concern relate to each other, to a measure of support for environmental protection, and to various respondent characteristics, including social status and political ideology. Results show that how growth management is measured does make a difference, in some cases, when individual responses are classified by social status or ideology.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- I'll Have My Town Medium-Rural, PleaseJournal of the American Planning Association, 1984
- The Suburban SqueezePublished by University of California Press ,1984
- Predicting Local Concern about Growth: The Roots of Citizen DiscontentJournal of Urban Affairs, 1984
- Growth Policies and Community StatusUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1983
- Environmental ConcernEnvironment and Behavior, 1981
- Environmentalism and Local Growth ControlEnvironment and Behavior, 1981
- Characteristics of Support for Local Growth ControlUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1981
- The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical EvidencePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1980
- Growth, Politics, and the Stratification of PlacesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1978