Screening for Type 2 diabetes—should it be now?
- 10 March 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetic Medicine
- Vol. 20 (3) , 175-181
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00842.x
Abstract
Screening for Type 2 diabetes has been recommended in several countries due to the increasing prevalence of diabetes. This review evaluates whether Type 2 diabetes is a disease that fulfils the criteria for screening set by the World Health Organization.Literature search was performed on the literature bases MedLine, Pub Medical, NIDDK, Cochrane Library and CINAHL using the MeSH terms 'non-insulin-dependent-diabetes-mellitus' and mass screening. Using this strategy we identified studies specifically evaluating screening strategies and diagnostic tests for Type 2 diabetes. The evaluation of psychosocial consequences included studies related to other chronic diseases. This literature was used to evaluate whether the WHO criteria for screening were fulfilled.The papers were reviewed but a meta-analysis was not possible, as no randomized controlled clinical trials were performed in the area of screening.Type 2 diabetes does not fulfil the criteria for population-based mass screening. No screening and intervention studies have been performed, systematically evaluating the positive and negative effects of screening. Furthermore, intervention studies up until now have been restricted to clinically diagnosed patients with diabetes, and most of these have recruited patients with long diabetes duration and early complications. These groups will have a worse prognosis and thus probably show greater benefits of such intervention. Finally, the psychosocial and health economic consequences of screening and intervention for Type 2 diabetes are largely unknown. Thus, systematic screening and intervention trials should be encouraged, and meanwhile intensified case finding and opportunistic screening in high-risk groups should be performed.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensified multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: the Steno type 2 randomised studyPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Prevention of Cardiovascular Events and Death with Pravastatin in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and a Broad Range of Initial Cholesterol LevelsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Performance of an NIDDM Screening Questionnaire Based on Symptoms and Risk FactorsDiabetes Care, 1997
- Screening for Diabetes Mellitus in Adults: The utility of random capillary blood glucose measurementsDiabetes Care, 1995
- Arguments in Favor of Screening for Diabetes in Cardiac RehabilitationJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 1995
- Random capillary whole blood glucose test as a screening test for diabetes mellitus in a middleaged populationScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1995
- Evaluation of Fasting Plasma Glucose as Screening Test for NIDDM in Older Adults: Rancho Bernardo StudyDiabetes Care, 1991
- Effectiveness and hazards of case finding for a high cholesterol concentration.BMJ, 1990
- Effects of labelling on income, work and social function among hypertensive employeesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1984