Long-term survival after minimally invasive resection versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
- 16 October 2020
- Vol. 23 (2) , 197-205
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.023
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Major Vascular Resection: a Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open ApproachesJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015
- Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 2014
- Defining the Learning Curve for Team-Based Laparoscopic PancreaticoduodenectomyAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2014
- Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessmentsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2014
- Minimally-Invasive vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2014
- Implementation of enhanced recovery programme after pancreatoduodenectomy: A single-centre UK pilot studyPancreatology, 2013
- Quality of Life After an EsophagectomySurgical Clinics of North America, 2012
- Interpretation of random effects meta-analysesBMJ, 2011
- Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysesEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJAMA, 2000