Clinically significant small-bowel pathology identified by double-balloon enteroscopy but missed by capsule endoscopy
- 30 September 2006
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 64 (3) , 445-449
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Obscure Gastrointestinal BleedingGastroenterology Clinics of North America, 2005
- A Meta-Analysis of the Yield of Capsule Endoscopy Compared to Other Diagnostic Modalities in Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal BleedingAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005
- The European experience with double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, methodology, safety, and clinical impactGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Comparison of Capsule Endoscopy and Enteroscopy with the Double-Balloon Method in Patients with Obscure Bleeding and PolyposisEndoscopy, 2005
- Push-and-Pull Enteroscopy in the Small Bowel Using the Double-Balloon Technique: Results of a Prospective European Multicenter StudyEndoscopy, 2005
- Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseasesPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Double-Balloon Enteroscopy: Preliminary Experience in Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding or Chronic Abdominal PainEndoscopy, 2003
- Obscure gastrointestinal bleedingGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2003
- Locally Advanced Small-Bowel Adenocarcinoma Missed Primarily by Capsule Endoscopy but Diagnosed by Push EnteroscopyEndoscopy, 2003
- The First Prospective Controlled Trial Comparing Wireless Capsule Endoscopy with Push Enteroscopy in Chronic Gastrointestinal BleedingEndoscopy, 2002