The Macromarketing Effects of Beverage Container Legislation
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Macromarketing
- Vol. 9 (1) , 24-34
- https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678900900104
Abstract
This article tests two major theories of consumer preference relevant to mandatory beverage container deposit legislation (MBCDL). It examines these theories in the context of market performance of the beverage industry as well as socioeconomic and environment issues. In an area where used beverage containers may be conceptualized as negative externalities or market failures, control of such containers can become the focus of public policy both to adjust private prices and to achieve the social goal of a litter-free environment. Six hypotheses were formulated to test these theories, and empirical data on per capita beer consumption in twenty-two states were used to test the effects of MBCDL on one of the hypotheses. The findings indicate that MBCDL appears to have an enduring negative effect on beer consumption (sales) in the United States.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public Regulation of Marketing Activity: Part I: Institutional Typologies of Market FailureJournal of Macromarketing, 1983
- Michigan's Experience with Mandatory Deposits on Beverage ContainersLand Economics, 1983
- Aggregate beer and wine consumption; effects of changes in the minimum legal drinking age and a mandatory beverage container deposit law in Michigan.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1982
- Consumer Satisfaction with Michigan's Container Deposit Law: An Ecological PerspectiveJournal of Marketing, 1982
- A Theory of Return for DepositCalifornia Management Review, 1980
- A social benefit-cost analysis of mandatory deposits on beverage containersJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1978
- N-of-one and N-of-two research in psychotherapy.Psychological Bulletin, 1973
- Bottles Cans EnergyEnvironment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 1972