Practice and Political Centralisation: A New Approach to Political Evolution [and Comments and Reply]
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in Current Anthropology
- Vol. 34 (2) , 111-140
- https://doi.org/10.1086/204149
Abstract
The increasing isolation of political evolutionary theory from theoretical developments in cultural anthropology is evidenced by a proclivity to interpret social change primarily in terms of material or demographic conditions and contingencies and functional or adaptive processes. This approach overlooks the enormous range of nonmaterial circumstances to which actors and the political systems they create also respond and tends to leave the processes involved in the emergence of political hierarchy undescribed and the human agent dimly sketched at best. An alternative perspective that addresses these shortcomings is offered by practice theory, which insists on incorporating nonmaterial as well as material circumstances into social process, stressing the role of individual agents in using these conditions and contingencies to create social life. This paper attempts to demonstrate the value of practice theory for the study of political centralisation by drawing out and empirically testing its novel predictions about the relationship between centralisation and demography.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The political economy of the Inka empire: the archaeology of power and financePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- Towards a Reflexive Sociology: A Workshop with Pierre BourdieuSociological Theory, 1989
- Prehistoric Hunter–Gatherers: The Meaning of Social ComplexityPublished by Elsevier ,1985
- A REAPPRAISAL OF REDISTRIBUTION: COMPLEX HAWAIIAN CHIEFDOMSPublished by Elsevier ,1977
- The Cultural Evolution of CivilizationsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1972