Methodology for assessing drug-drug interaction evidence in the peer-reviewed medical literature
- 31 August 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Current Therapeutic Research
- Vol. 61 (8) , 553-568
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-393x(00)80038-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disagreement among drug compendia on inclusion and ratings of drug-drug interactionsCurrent Therapeutic Research, 2000
- Understanding and evaluating clinical trialsJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1996
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Collecting the Evidence Systematically:Ensuring That It Is Complete and Up-to-DateInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996
- Systematic reviews - theory and practiceScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1994
- The comprehensiveness of Medline and Embase computer searchesInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 1992
- Low-molecular-weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysisThe Lancet, 1992
- How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searchesComputers and Biomedical Research, 1990
- Frequency, severity and risk factors for adverse drug reactions in adult out-patients: A prospective studyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. I. Background, description, and instructions for useJAMA, 1979