A Consideration of Intimate and Non‐Intimate Interactions in Therapy
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Family Process
- Vol. 31 (1) , 45-59
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1992.00045.x
Abstract
Viewing therapy as a conversation among participants, rather than as an interview concluding with an intervention selected by an expert, allows one to consider the contributions of each member of the conversation in comparable terms. I propose a distinction between intimate interaction, in which meaning is co-created or shared, and non-intimate interaction, in which meaning is rejected, provided, or misunderstood. I suggest that intimate interaction between therapists and clients is therapeutic and that non-intimate interaction rarely is. However, it is in the acknowledgment and repair of the inevitable lapses of intimate interaction that occur between therapists and clients that there is an opportunity for a profoundly meaningful collaboration.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Therapist-patient sexual involvement: A review of the researchClinical Psychology Review, 1990
- The Therapeutic Use of Self in Constructionist/Systemic TherapyFamily Process, 1990
- Beyond Cybernetics: Comments on Atkinson and Heath's “Further Thoughts on Second‐Order Family Therapy”Family Process, 1990
- "A Momentary Gleam of Enlightenment"Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 1989
- The Power of Not Understanding: The Meeting of Conflicting IdentitiesThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1989
- The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology.American Psychologist, 1988
- Generation and Gender: Normative and Covert HierarchiesFamily Process, 1988
- The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology.American Psychologist, 1988
- Interventive Interviewing: Part I. Strategizing as a Fourth Guideline for the TherapistFamily Process, 1987
- The social constructionist movement in modern psychology.American Psychologist, 1985