2. Average Predictive Comparisons for Models with Nonlinearity, Interactions, and Variance Components
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methodology
- Vol. 37 (1) , 23-51
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2007.00181.x
Abstract
In a predictive model, what is the expected difference in the outcome associated with a unit difference in one of the inputs? In a linear regression model without interactions, this average predictive comparison is simply a regression coefficient (with associated uncertainty). In a model with nonlinearity or interactions, however, the average predictive comparison in general depends on the values of the predictors. We consider various definitions based on averages over a population distribution of the predictors, and we compute standard errors based on uncertainty in model parameters. We illustrate with a study of criminal justice data for urban counties in the United States. The outcome of interest measures whether a convicted felon received a prison sentence rather than a jail or non-custodial sentence, with predictors available at both individual and county levels. We fit three models: (1) a hierarchical logistic regression with varying coefficients for the within-county intercepts as well as for each individual predictor; (2) a hierarchical model with varying intercepts only; and (3) a nonhierarchical model that ignores the multilevel nature of the data. The regression coefficients have different interpretations for the different models; in contrast, the models can be compared directly using predictive comparisons. Furthermore, predictive comparisons clarify the interplay between the individual and county predictors for the hierarchical models and also illustrate the relative size of varying county effects.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of variance—why it is more important than everThe Annals of Statistics, 2005
- Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training ProgramsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- Treatment Effects in a Logistic Model Involving the Box-Cox TransformationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- Not Asked and Not Answered: Multiple Imputation for Multiple SurveysJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1998
- Odds versus Probabilities in Logit Equations: A Reply to RoncekSocial Forces, 1993
- Using Logit Coefficients to Obtain the Effects of Independent Variables on Changes in ProbabilitiesSocial Forces, 1991
- A Graphical Method for the Interpretation of Multinomial Logit AnalysisSociological Methods & Research, 1987
- The Analysis of Transformed DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- Corrected group prognostic curves and summary statisticsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1982
- Covariance adjustment of rates based on the multiple logistic regression modelJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981