Surfaces versus features in visual search
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 359 (6392) , 231-233
- https://doi.org/10.1038/359231a0
Abstract
Often implicit in the interpretation of visual search tasks is the assumption that the detection of targets is determined by the feature-coding properties of low-level visual processing. But higher level processes have also been implicated as visual search ability is enhanced in a depth plane or when two-dimensional shapes are interpreted as three-dimensional forms. Here we manipulate binocular disparity to degrade visual search, so that otherwise identical features become parts of surfaces through perceptual completion, rendering them less clearly distinguishable as targets and distractors. Our results indicate that visual search has little or no access to the processing level of feature extraction but must have as an input a higher level process of surface representation.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the perception of shape from shadingPerception & Psychophysics, 1992
- Sensitivity to Three-Dimensional Orientation in Visual SearchPsychological Science, 1990
- Amodal Representation of Occluded Surfaces: Role of Invisible Stimuli in Apparent Motion CorrespondencePerception, 1990
- Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanismsJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1990
- Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded ObjectsPerception, 1989
- Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctionsNature, 1986
- Depth separation and lateral interferencePerception & Psychophysics, 1981
- Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactionsNature, 1981
- A feature-integration theory of attentionCognitive Psychology, 1980
- Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual groupingPerception & Psychophysics, 1966