The relationship between indoor and outdoor Snellen visual acuity in cataract patients

Abstract
One hundred six cataractous eyes of 78 patients were evaluated to examine the relationship between indoor and outdoor Snellen visual acuity. While 81 of all cataractous eyes (76.4%) had Snellen visual acuities of 20/40 or better when tested indoors, only 33 eyes (31.2%) had 20/40 or better Snellen visual acuities when tested outdoors facing the sun. When tested indoors, only three eyes (2.8%) had Snellen visual acuities worse than 20/80, while 31 eyes (29.2%) had outdoor Snellen visual acuities worse than 20/80. Ten eyes (9.4%) had outdoor Snellen visual acuities worse than 20/200. Seventy-four eyes (69.8%) had outdoor visual acuities that were at least two Snellen lines worse than those measured indoors and 23 eyes (21.7%) had outdoor visual acuities that were at least five Snellen lines worse. The median difference between indoor and outdoor visual acuity was three Snellen lines. The need for increased precision in the ability to assess outdoor "real world" vision while in the ophthalmologist's examination room is discussed. Clearly, indoor Snellen visual acuity alone is insufficient to evaluate functional visual impairment in cataract patients.

This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit: