Prognostic significance of progression of coronary atherosclerosis.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
BACKGROUND Angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis is frequently observed in clinical practice and is used as an end point in clinical trials; however, its prognostic significance is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS Progression defined as an increase in diameter stenosis by > or = 15% of at least one coronary lesion was seen in 141 (42%) of 335 patients who underwent repeat coronary arteriography after a 2-year interval as part of clinical trial. Coronary lesions were measured quantitatively from comparable end-diastolic frames selected by a radiologist viewing each pair of films together. During a mean follow-up of 44 +/- 10 months after the second arteriogram, cardiac death occurred in 19 patients (5.7%), cardiac death or nonfatal infarction was seen in 40 cases (11.9%), and 90 patients (26.9%) underwent coronary revascularization. At least one end point event occurred in 112 of the 335 patients. Sixteen of the 19 cardiac deaths were in progressors, a relative risk of 7.3 (95% CI, 2.2-24.7; p < 0.001). The relative risk of cardiac death or nonfatal infarction for progressors was 2.3 (1.3-4.2, p = 0.009) and of any cardiac event was 1.7 (1.3-2.3, p < 0.001). A stepwise multivariable Cox regression model of time to event was used to assess the relative contribution of progression as a predictor of coronary events. Low ejection fraction (p = 0.001), progression (p = 0.001), and hypertension (p = 0.011) were retained as predictors of cardiac death. Angina and the number of diseased vessels were the strongest predictors of revascularization. CONCLUSIONS Coronary progression is a strong, independent predictor of future coronary events, particularly cardiac death, and its use as a surrogate end point in clinical trials is justified.

This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit: