Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Environmental Science & Policy
- Vol. 6 (3) , 195-204
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1462-9011(03)00035-2
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Willingness to pay in different policy-planning methods: insights into respondents’ decision-making processesEcological Economics, 2002
- Incommensurable preferences in contingent valuation: the case of Natura 2000 Network in FinlandEnvironmental Conservation, 2000
- Contingent valuation of the Natura 2000 nature conservation programme in FinlandForestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 2000
- Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in ScotlandJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1998
- Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent ValuationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998
- Spike Models in Contingent ValuationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997
- A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuationEcological Economics, 1996
- Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysisEcological Economics, 1996
- BENEFITS OF PRESERVING OLD‐GROWTH FORESTS AND THE SPOTTED OWLContemporary Economic Policy, 1992
- Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete ResponsesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1984