Treatment of Infection in the Presence of an Indwelling Urethral Catheter
- 1 June 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 54 (3) , 316-319
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1982.tb06987.x
Abstract
It is unnecessary to treat laboratory-diagnosed urinary tract infection in the absence of clinical symptoms and signs in patients from whom specimens of urine have been taken from indwelling urethral catheters left in situ for > 1 wk. If there is clinical evidence of infection, the catheter should be removed, a new catheter inserted and a specimen taken for examination. Alternatively, a suprapubic aspirate of urine may be examined bacteriologically as a treatment guide. In a absence of symptoms or other signs of infection it is doubtful whether chemotherapy is indicated.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relevance of Urinary Sampling Methods in Patients with Indwelling Foley CathetersBritish Journal of Urology, 1980
- MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION OF URINEThe Lancet, 1978
- MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION OF URINE1978
- Direct microscopy of uncentrifuged urine.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1973
- THE INDWELLING URETHRAL CATHETER IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE SPINAL CORD TRAUMAThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1973
- Suprapubic Bladder Aspiration in Diagnosis of Urinary Tract InfectionBMJ, 1969
- Method for the detection of significant bacteriuria in large groups of patientsJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1964