In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers
- 1 April 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Calcified Tissue International
- Vol. 48 (4) , 245-248
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02556375
Abstract
Summary Six Hologic QDR-1000 DEXA bone densitometers at different centers across the USA were compared to determine the intermachine variability. Nine scans in succession were acquired on each machine using a single anthropomorphic lumbar spine phantom (manufactured by Hologic). Values for BMC, area, and BMD were recorded for each measurement. Means, standard deviations (SD), and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated for each machine. All the CVs (BMC, area, BMD) were less than 1% (range 0.3%–0.6%). The CV of the means at the six sites were 0.4%, 0.6%, and 0.5% for BMC, area, and BMD, respectively. Although several significant differences for BMC, area, and BMD were noted by ANOVA between machines at different sites, the difference between the highest and lowest means of the individual machines was only 1.1%, 1.31%, and 1.07% for BMC, area, and BMD. The small variations between the DEXA systems are encouraging for researchers involved in multicenter trials in which data are pooled.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- EFFECT OF SOURCE STRENGTH AND ATTENUATION ON DUAL PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY1989
- Quantitative Digital RadiographyVersusDual Photon Absorptiometry of the Lumbar Spine*Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1988
- Dual energy radiography (DER): A preliminary comparative studyCalcified Tissue International, 1988
- Dual photon absorptimetric measurements of bone mineral density increase with source lifeCalcified Tissue International, 1987
- Should Women Get Screening Bone Mass Measurements?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1986