Costs and quality in the treatment of acute depression in primary care: a comparison between England, Germany and Switzerland
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in International Clinical Psychopharmacology
- Vol. 19 (4) , 201-208
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.yic.0000130230.72877.a1
Abstract
No study has yet compared the costs and quality of depression treatment between European countries. The present study aimed to compare the costs and quality of treatment for the first manifestation of an acute major depression in England, Germany and Switzerland. Seventy-four randomly selected physician practices assessed their services for one hypothetical average patient (cost evaluation) and 73 practices reported retrospective data on one real patient (quality evaluation) for the year 2001. Reimbursement fees served as unit costs for Germany and Switzerland. Average reimbursement fees were used to measure resource utilization in all countries. Resource utilization was lowest in Switzerland. The percentage of patients receiving evidence-based treatment for major depression was insignificantly higher in Switzerland and England compared to Germany (56%, 52% and 35%, respectively; P>0.30). Switzerland was both the most effective and the most efficient country (in terms of resource utilization) in providing outpatient treatment for depression.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- European comparison of costs and quality in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (2000–2001)European Heart Journal, 2002
- Are Subjects in Pharmacological Treatment Trials of Depression Representative of Patients in Routine Clinical Practice?American Journal of Psychiatry, 2002
- Prevalence and recognition of depressive syndromes in German primary care settings: poorly recognized and treated?International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2001
- Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelinesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2000
- How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?BMJ, 2000
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Depression in the communityInternational Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1997
- Randomised controlled trial comparing problem solving treatment with amitriptyline and placebo for major depression in primary careBMJ, 1995
- In Search of Power and Significance: Issues in the Design and Analysis of Stochastic Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Health CareMedical Care, 1994
- Using Claims Data for Epidemiologic ResearchMedical Care, 1993