Sexual Ethics
Open Access
- 9 February 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 158 (3) , 253-257
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.3.253
Abstract
FOR THE past decade, the US Public Health Service guidelines have recommended that individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) notify their sexual partners.1 Nondisclosure of HIV status has been condemned as both a moral and a legal offense subject to both civil liability and criminal prosecution.2 However, practical and psychological difficulties of disclosure exist for sexually active individuals living with HIV. Decisions about disclosure of HIV status involve anxiety, stigma, and shame. Divulging to sexual partners may lead to isolation or even physical injury.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- AIDS Prevention — Sexual Ethics and ResponsibilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Self-disclosure of HIV infection among men who vary in time since seropositive diagnosis and symptomatic statusAIDS, 1995
- Disclosing HIV seropositivity to significant othersAIDS, 1993
- Behavior changes after notification of HIV infection.American Journal of Public Health, 1991
- Self-disclosure of HIV infection to sexual partners.American Journal of Public Health, 1991
- Behavioral, health and psychosocial factors and risk for HIV infection among sexually active homosexual men: the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study.American Journal of Public Health, 1991
- Sex, Lies, and HIVNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Targeting AIDS Prevention and Treatment Toward HIV-1—Infected PersonsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1989
- Effects of HIV antibody test knowledge on subsequent sexual behaviors in a cohort of homosexually active men.American Journal of Public Health, 1988
- The CAGE Questionnaire: Validation of a New Alcoholism Screening InstrumentAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1974