STUDENTS' APPLICATIONS OF SELF‐QUESTIONING STUDY TECHNIQUES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THEIR EFFICACY
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Reading Psychology
- Vol. 6 (1-2) , 69-83
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271850060108
Abstract
This article describes the results of a study in which college developmental reading students were taught how to use study techniques which involved self‐questioning. Over a nine‐week period, subjects were trained in the application of SQ3R (Robinson, 1961), REAP (Eanet & Manzo, 1976), and self‐questioning (Andre & Anderson, 1978‐79) to content area prose materials. Quantitative results indicated that the SQ3R group significantly outperformed the REAP group on a posttest measure of comprehension. No other significant differences were found. In addition, a qualitative analysis was conducted to determine how well subjects processed information during the application of their specific study techniques. These findings indicated that: (1) structured study techniques may be more effective for aiding students' retention of content area prose materials; (2) students are more concerned with detail or factual information than “higher level” forms of information; and (3) instructors of college developmental reading students need to instruct their students as to how to generate questions at all levels of comprehension.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Use of Verbal Reports in Reading ResearchJournal of Reading Behavior, 1984
- Students' Self-Questioning and Summarizing as Reading Study StrategiesJournal of Reading Behavior, 1984
- Instructional Strategies for Studying Content Area Texts in the Intermediate GradesReading Research Quarterly, 1982
- The Development and Evaluation of a Self-Questioning Study TechniqueReading Research Quarterly, 1978
- Effect of question production and answering on prose recall.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975
- A comparative study of the brief, the pr?cis, and the essay with respect to speed of reading and ease of learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1938