The Role of Misfit Dislocation During Epitaxial Growth
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in MRS Proceedings
Abstract
The theory of Frank and van der Merwe (FM) in 1949 showed that a minimum energy criterion could explain the pseudomorphic growth of a deposit on a substrate of different lattice spacing and the subsequent relief of strain by misfit dislocations as the deposit thickness increases. Although the “equilibrium” theory is qualitatively correct, account must be taken of actual dislocation sources, which may be complex, and which may be more or less efficient for misfit relief than predicted by the FM model. Moreover, misfit dislocation sources may determine the morphology of the growing film, the interface topology and even the atomic structure of the deposit/substrate interface. These various roles of misfit dislocations are reviewed here with examples from work on metal/metal, semiconductor/semiconductor and metal/semiconductor systems.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The atomic structure of the NiSi2-(001)Si interfacePhilosophical Magazine A, 1984
- Misfit Dislocations in Epitaxial Layers of SI on Gap (001) SubstratesMRS Proceedings, 1984
- On the Structure of Metal Silicide:Silicon Interfaces.MRS Proceedings, 1983
- High resolution surface study by In-situ UHV transmission electron microscopyUltramicroscopy, 1982
- Electron microscope studies of the structure and propagation of the Pd2Si/(111)Si interfacePhilosophical Magazine A, 1982
- Properties of aluminum epitaxial growth on GaAsJournal of Applied Physics, 1981
- UHV transmission electron microscopy on the reconstructed surface of (111) goldSurface Science, 1981
- COHERENT INTERFACES AND MISFIT DISLOCATIONSPublished by Elsevier ,1975
- ENERGY OF INTERFACES BETWEEN CRYSTALSPublished by Elsevier ,1975
- One-dimensional dislocations. I. Static theoryProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1949