Class Analysis: Back to the Future
- 1 November 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociology
- Vol. 28 (4) , 933-942
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038594028004008
Abstract
Debates over the Weberian programme for class analysis have involved a number of unresolved theoretical problems. It is argued that these problems can be resolved only if the theoretical foundations of the programme are clarified. In particular, the Weberian distinction between `class situation' and `social class', along with the distinction between `class' and `status', must be used to resolve the questions of the demographic formation of social classes, the individual and the family household as units of analysis, and the relationship between gender and class.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Class in Modern BritainPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2005
- Class and StratificationPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1999
- Does Class Analysis without Class Theory have a Promising Future?: A Reply to Goldthorpe and MarshallSociology, 1993
- The Promising Future of Class Analysis: A Response to Recent CritiquesSociology, 1992
- Women and Class Analysis: A Reply to the RepliesSociology, 1984
- Women's Jobs do Make a Difference: A Reply to GoldthorpeSociology, 1984
- Social Class of Men, Women and FamiliesSociology, 1984
- Women and Class Analysis: A Reply to John GoldthorpeSociology, 1984
- Women and Class Analysis: In Defence of the Conventional ViewSociology, 1983
- The Nuffield Class CategorizationSociology, 1981