CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF INADEQUATE INHALATION TECHNIQUE IN ASTHMA THERAPY
- 1 February 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 70 (2) , 93-98
Abstract
The FEV1-increase after inhalation of a beta2-stimulant metered-dose aerosol was studied in 23 patients treated by specialists. The effect of their spontaneous inhalation technique was compared with that of controlled inhalation, which was optimised by means of a device controlling the breathing pattern and release of the metered-dose aerosol. This allowed quantitative assessment of the loss of bronchodilatation caused by the spontaneous inhalation technique. Thirteen patients who were observed to make inhalation errors showed a significant loss of bronchodilatation (30%), whereas ten patients who were observed to make no inhalation errors showed an insignificant loss of bronchodilatation (13%). It is concluded that when a metered-dose aerosol is used in general clinical practice there is a considerable loss of potential efficacy.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of InspirEase on the Deposition of Metered-Dose Aerosols in the Human Respiratory TractChest, 1986
- An objective assessment of the tube spacer in patients unable to use a conventional pressurized aerosol efficientlyRespiratory Medicine, 1981
- The adequacy of inhalation of aerosol from canister nebulizersThe American Journal of Medicine, 1980
- SURVEY OF THE CLINICAL USE OF PRESSURIZED AEROSOL INHALERS1979
- SPIROMETRIC STUDIES IN NORMAL SUBJECT .1. FORCED EXPIROGRAMS IN SUBJECTS BETWEEN 7 AND 70 YEARS OF AGE1963