Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines?
Open Access
- 8 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Anatomy
- Vol. 210 (2) , 232-236
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00686.x
Abstract
The line joining the superior aspect of the iliac crests posteriorly (the intercristal line) is commonly stated to cross the midline at the L4 or L4–5 spinal level on imaging. This study aimed to assess the spinal level identified through palpation of surface anatomy (iliac crests and posterior superior iliac spines) in adults and the level of agreement compared with the intercristal line identified through imaging. The study participants included consecutive adult patients undergoing prone fluoroscopically guided spinal injections for chronic low back pain at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, between April and July 2004. Prior to fluoroscopic imaging, each patient's surface anatomy was palpated by two examiners and lines created to form the palpated intercristal line and the posterior superior iliac spine line. Following imaging, the mid-line spinal levels identified by these palpated lines were recorded and the level of agreement (kappa coefficient) with the intercristal line formed by imaging of the iliac crests was assessed. The results showed that although the L4 or L4–5 spinal levels were identified on imaging of the intercristal line in 86.7% of 75 patients (49 female), the intercristal line formed through palpation tended to identify higher levels; the L3 or L3–4 spinal levels in 77.3% of cases and more commonly in females than in males (85.7 vs. 61.5%) and in patients with higher body mass indices. The level of agreement between the two lines was poor (κ = 0.05). The posterior superior iliac spine line identified the S2 spinous process in 51% and the S1 in 44% of 60 (45 female) patients. The results suggest that formation of the intercristal line by palpation of the iliac crests identifies different spinal levels to those identified by imaging and that both methods should be regarded as different instruments. In the clinical situation, it may be more appropriate to consider that palpation of the intercristal line is a guide for identifying the L3 or L3–4 spinal levels rather than the L4 or L4–5 levels, particularly in females and patients with higher body mass indices.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The tenth rib line as a new landmark of the lumbar vertebral level during spinal blockAnaesthesia, 2004
- Influence of lumbar flexion on the position of the intercrestal lineRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2003
- Influence of Lumbar Flexion on the Position of the Intercrestal LineRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2003
- The reproducibility of the iliac crest as a marker of lumbar spine levelAnaesthesia, 1996
- Variations in morphology of the lumbosacral junction on sagittal MRI: correlation with plain radiographySkeletal Radiology, 1996
- How Useful Is Body Mass Index for Comparison of Body Fatness across Age, Sex, and Ethnic Groups?American Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Continuous Spinal AnesthesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1993
- Jacoby??s Line Rather Than Tuffier??s Line as a Guide to Lumbar PunctureAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992
- ACCURACY OF PLACEMENT OF EXTRADURAL NEEDLES IN THE L3-4 INTERSPACE: COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF IDENTIFYING L4British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1991
- X-Ray Studies of the Lumbosacral SpineSouthern Medical Journal, 1966