Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different
Open Access
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 58 (5) , 734-747
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213106
Abstract
In an extension of a study by Vitu, O’Regan, Inhoff, and Topolski (1995), we compared global and local characteristics of eye movements during (1) reading, (2) the scanning of transformed text (in which each letter was replaced with a z), and (3) visual search. Additionally, we examined eye behavior with respect to specific target words of high or low frequency. Globally, the reading condition led to shorter fixations, longer saccades, and less frequent skipping of target strings than did scanning transformed text. Locally, the manipulation of word frequency affected fixation durations on the target word during reading, but not during visual search or z-string scanning. There were also more refixations on target words in reading than in scanning. Contrary to Vitu et al.’s (1995) findings, our results show that eye movements are not guided by a global strategy and local tactics, but by immediate processing demands.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 1995
- Attention demands during reading and the occurrence of brief (express) fixationsPerception & Psychophysics, 1993
- Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processesLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 1989
- Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1989
- Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in readingPerception & Psychophysics, 1986
- Redundancy and word perception during readingPerception & Psychophysics, 1984
- Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1984
- Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1984
- Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
- Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesisPerception & Psychophysics, 1979