Editorial Commentary:Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy: How Much Is Enough?
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 43 (7) , 942-944
- https://doi.org/10.1086/507549
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Less Than 95% Adherence to Nonnucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitor Therapy Can Lead to Viral SuppressionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Similar Adherence Rates Favor Different Virologic Outcomes for Patients Treated with Nonnucleoside Analogues or Protease InhibitorsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir DF vs Stavudine in Combination Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naive PatientsA 3-Year Randomized TrialJAMA, 2004
- A Proof‐of‐Concept Study of Short‐Cycle Intermittent Antiretroviral Therapy with a Once‐Daily Regimen of Didanosine, Lamivudine, and Efavirenz for the Treatment of Chronic HIV InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Triple-Nucleoside Regimens versus Efavirenz-Containing Regimens for the Initial Treatment of HIV-1 InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- GW433908/ritonavir once daily in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-infected patientsAIDS, 2004
- Incidence of Resistance in a Double‐Blind Study Comparing Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus Stavudine and Lamivudine to Nelfinavir plus Stavudine and LamivudineThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Lopinavir–Ritonavir versus Nelfinavir for the Initial Treatment of HIV InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Efavirenz plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine, Efavirenz plus Indinavir, and Indinavir plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine in the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Impact of protease inhibitors on AIDS-defining events and hospitalizations in 10 French AIDS reference centresAIDS, 1997