The viscosity structure of the mantle
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Reviews of Geophysics
- Vol. 33 (S1) , 11-17
- https://doi.org/10.1029/95rg00279
Abstract
During 1991–1994,the four year period covered by this report,there has been a shift in emphasis away from one‐dimensional (radial) mantle viscosity models and toward an understanding of the three‐dimensional (radial and lateral) structure of mantle viscosity. Our understanding of mantle viscosity comes primarily from two sources: studying the creep properties of mantle minerals under appropriate pressures and temperatures and using theoretical flow models to predict surface observables, such as: plate velocities, gravity, geoid, and heat flow. Laboratory measurements of deformation indicate that the rheology of upper mantle minerals such as olivine ((Mg,Fe)2SiO4) is a strong function of temperatue, grain size, and stress [cf., Karato and Wu, 1993]. The deformation of minerals under mantle conditions generally follows a flow law of the form urn:x-wiley:87551209:media:rog1798:rog1798-math-0001 where ϵ is the deformation rate,σ is the deviatoric stress, μ is the shear modulus,d is the grain size of the rock, Q is the activation energy for the deformation mechanism,T is the temperature in Kelvin,R is the gas constant and A is a constant. Viscosity is defined as urn:x-wiley:87551209:media:rog1798:rog1798-math-0002 therefore, deformation is directly related to viscosity. Substituting equation (1) into equation (2), an effective viscosity, urn:x-wiley:87551209:media:rog1798:rog1798-math-0003 can be defined.For temperature changes of 100 degrees K, the viscosity changes by an order of magnitude at constant stress [cf., Karato and Wu,1993].Changes of deviatoric stress by a factor of 2 change the viscosity by an order of magnitude [cf., Karato and Wu,1993]. Other factors, such as partial pressure of oxygen and water content may also have important effects.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subduction zone dip angles and flow driven by plate motionPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Subducted slabs and the geoid: 1. Numerical experiments with temperature‐dependent viscosityJournal of Geophysical Research, 1994
- Postglacial rebound with a non‐Newtonian upper mantle and a Newtonian lower mantle rheologyGeophysical Research Letters, 1992
- An inversion for radial viscosity structure using seismic tomographyGeophysical Research Letters, 1992
- Geoid effects in a convecting system with lateral viscosity variationsGeophysical Research Letters, 1992
- Constraints on mantle viscosity from relative sea level variations in Hudson BayGeophysical Research Letters, 1992
- Thermal convection in the Earth's mantle: Mode coupling induced by temperature‐dependent viscosity in a three‐dimensional spherical shellGeophysical Research Letters, 1992
- Dynamical effects of a hard garnet layer in the transition zone on geophysical signatures: geoid anomalies and postglacial reboundPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1990
- Finite element modeling of lateral viscosity heterogeneities and post-glacial reboundTectonophysics, 1990
- Effects of lateral viscosity variations on postglacial rebound: Implications for recent sea‐level trendsGeophysical Research Letters, 1990