Does Mandated Audit Communication Reduce Opportunistic Corrections to Manage Earnings to Forecasts?
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in The Accounting Review
- Vol. 75 (4) , 383-404
- https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.4.383
Abstract
This paper reports two experiments in which Big 5 audit managers estimate reported (audited) earnings conditional on analysts' consensus forecast, auditing standards, and auditor discovery of a quantitatively immaterial earnings overstatement. We find that auditors judge overstatement correction less likely if it would cause a missed forecast, even for objectively measured misstatements. This behavior is consistent with SEC Chairman Levitt's concerns about opportunistic corrections to manage earnings to forecasts. Also, SAS No. 89's mandated representations and communications do not increase corrections that would cause a missed forecast, indicating that the Auditing Standards Board has limited ability to reduce opportunistic corrections through such regulations.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Disposition of Audit‐Detected Misstatements: An Examination of Risk and Reward Factors and Aggregation Effects*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2001
- A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard SettingAccounting Horizons, 1999
- Earnings Management to Exceed ThresholdsThe Journal of Business, 1999
- Auditor Attention to and Judgments of Aggressive Financial ReportingJournal of Accounting Research, 1999
- Managerial Behavior and the Bias in Analysts' Earnings ForecastsSSRN Electronic Journal, 1998
- Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and lossesJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1997
- Determinants of the Justifiability of Performance in Ill-Structured Audit TasksJournal of Accounting Research, 1997
- Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1996
- Factors Related to Auditor‐Client Disagreements over Income‐Increasing Accounting Methods*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1993