Early versus delayed cholecystectomy: The effect of a change in management
- 1 November 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 68 (11) , 753-757
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800681102
Abstract
Summary: After a controlled trial, conservative treatment followed by delayed operation was replaced by early operation as the treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis. Results before and after this change were compared. The comparison confirmed that early cholecystectomy leads to more rapid recovery and to less time spent in hospital. There was no significant difference between the two procedures in the duration of operation and the incidence of wound infection. Early operation caused fewer biliary fistulas and was accompanied by a lower mortality.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The management of acute cholecystitis and its hospital costBritish Journal of Surgery, 1980
- Early Cholecystectomy for Acute CholecystitisAnnals of Surgery, 1980
- SURGEON-RELATED VARIABLES AND THE CLINICAL TRIALThe Lancet, 1978
- Acute Cholecystitis Treated by Early and Delayed Surgery. A Controlled Clinical TrialScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1978
- Controlled clinical trial comparing early with interval cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Acute cholecystitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Early and delayed operation in acute gall-stone diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1973
- The Management of Acute CholecystitisSurgical Clinics of North America, 1973
- Early versus delayed operation for acute cholecystitis: A controlled clinical trialThe American Journal of Surgery, 1970
- Effect of treatment on liver function disturbance in patients with acute cholecystitisThe American Journal of Surgery, 1968