Publication Rates Following Pancreas Meetings
- 1 August 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pancreas
- Vol. 23 (2) , 212-215
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006676-200108000-00012
Abstract
Publication rates and determinants of publication were studied based on abstracts presented at pancreatic meetings. All abstracts presented at the 1994 and 1995 annual meetings of the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and the American Pancreatic Association (APA) were followed up by searching MEDLINE. Publication rates were compared using log-rank tests and multiple logistic regression. The prestige of the publishing journals was compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests on scientific impact factors (SIF). Overall, 340 abstracts were presented at the EPC, and 254 were presented at the APA. Of these, 203 (59.7%, EPC) and 138 (54.3%, APA) were later published in peer-reviewed journals. Publication rates did not differ by study type or country region of origin. In addition, median SIFs were similar by conference (APA vs. EPC) and research type (basic science vs. clinical studies) (overall, 1.7). However, North American and North/West European articles were published in higher impact journals as compared with those from other countries. Publication rates and median journal SIFs in pancreas research are similar to those reported from other medical specialty meetings. There is no difference by conference, type of research, or origin (North American vs. European).Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘Schicksal’ wissenschaftlicher Beiträge auf grossen AnästhesiekongressenDer Anaesthesist, 1999
- The Publication Rates of Presentations at Major Spine Specialty Society Meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS)Spine, 1999
- Publication Rates for the Scientific Sessions of the OTAJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1998
- Oral contraceptive use and smoking are risk factors for relapse in Crohn's diseaseGastroenterology, 1998
- Fate of conference abstractsNature, 1996
- Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysisJAMA, 1994
- The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: Factors which influence presentation and subsequent publicationAnnals of Oncology, 1992
- Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boardsJAMA, 1992
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Publication of Research Presented at the Pediatric MeetingsAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children, 1985