Telomeres avoid end detection by severing the checkpoint signal transduction pathway

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The ends of chromosomes, known as telomeres, present a challenge to the cell — they look like an end generated by a double-strand break, but if treated as such, the DNA damage-repair system would initiate a checkpoint response and cause telomere–telomere fusions. Carneiro et al. now show that telomeres lack two types of histone modification that are required for recruitment of Crb253BP1, and that without Crb253BP1, even if other DNA damage-response proteins are recruited to a Taz1-deficient telomere, the checkpoint cannot be activated. These histone modifications are dependent on two telomere-binding proteins, Pot1 and Ccq1. The ends of chromosomes, known as telomeres, look like ends generated by double-strand breaks, but if treated as such the DNA damage repair system would initiate a checkpoint response and cause telomere–telomere fusions. These authors show that telomeres lack two types of histone modification that are required for recruitment of Crb2b53BP1, without which the checkpoint cannot be activated even if other DNA damage response proteins are recruited to a Taz1-deficient telomere. Telomeres protect the normal ends of chromosomes from being recognized as deleterious DNA double-strand breaks. Recent studies have uncovered an apparent paradox: although DNA repair is prevented, several proteins involved in DNA damage processing and checkpoint responses are recruited to telomeres in every cell cycle and are required for end protection1. It is currently not understood how telomeres prevent DNA damage responses from causing permanent cell cycle arrest. Here we show that fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) cells lacking Taz1, an orthologue of human TRF1 and TRF2 (ref. 2), recruit DNA repair proteins (Rad22RAD52 and Rhp51RAD51, where the superscript indicates the human orthologue) and checkpoint sensors (RPA, Rad9, Rad26ATRIP and Cut5/Rad4TOPBP1) to telomeres. Despite this, telomeres fail to accumulate the checkpoint mediator Crb253BP1 and, consequently, do not activate Chk1-dependent cell cycle arrest. Artificially recruiting Crb253BP1 to taz1Δ telomeres results in a full checkpoint response and cell cycle arrest. Stable association of Crb253BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks requires two independent histone modifications: H4 dimethylation at lysine 20 (H4K20me2) and H2A carboxy-terminal phosphorylation (γH2A)3,4,5. Whereas γH2A can be readily detected, telomeres lack H4K20me2, in contrast to internal chromosome locations. Blocking checkpoint signal transduction at telomeres requires Pot1 and Ccq1, and loss of either Pot1 or Ccq1 from telomeres leads to Crb253BP1 foci formation, Chk1 activation and cell cycle arrest. Thus, telomeres constitute a chromatin-privileged region of the chromosomes that lack essential epigenetic markers for DNA damage response amplification and cell cycle arrest. Because the protein kinases ATM and ATR must associate with telomeres in each S phase to recruit telomerase6, exclusion of Crb253BP1 has a critical role in preventing telomeres from triggering cell cycle arrest.