Nasogastric compared with nasoduodenal feeding in low birthweight infants.
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 61 (2) , 138-141
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.61.2.138
Abstract
One hundred successive infants weighing less than 1500 g at birth were allocated alternately to intermittent nasogastric or continuous nasoduodenal feeding regimens. Eighty were appropriate for gestational age, and of these 25 fed successfully by nasogastric tube and 16 tolerated nasoduodenal feeding until 1600 g. No significant differences in either calorie intake or growth rates were identified throughout the seven weeks of the study. Because of the increased complexity and radiological exposure involved with feeding transpylorically, nasogastric feeding may be preferred as a method of feeding the low birthweight infant.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Parenteral nutrition compared with transpyloric feeding.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1984
- Poor weight gain of the low birthweight infant fed nasojejunally.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1982
- The later development of the brain and its vulnerabilityJournal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 1982
- Controlled Study of Transpyloric and Intermittent Gavage Feeding in the Small Preterm InfantPediatrics, 1981
- Total parenteral nutrition in very low birthweight infants: A controlled trialArchives of Disease in Childhood, 1979
- Impaired assimilation of nasojejunal feeds in healthy low-birth-weight newborn infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1977
- Intestinal perforations secondary to nasojejunal feeding tubesAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1976
- Duodenal perforation: A complication of neonatal nasojejunal feedingThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1974
- Intravenous alimentation in pediatric patientsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1972
- The Effect of Severe Early Malnutrition on Cellular Growth of Human BrainPediatric Research, 1969