Sexual conflict and reproductive isolation in flies
- 25 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Biology Letters
- Vol. 5 (5) , 697-699
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0066
Abstract
Sexual conflict is predicted to generate more rapid reproductive isolation between larger populations. While there is some empirical support for this, the data are inconsistent and, additionally, there has been criticism of some of the evidence. Here we reanalyse two experimental-evolution datasets using an isolation index widely applied in the speciation literature. We find evidence for reproductive isolation through sexual conflict in Sepsis cynipsea, but not in Drosophila melanogaster, and this occurred to a greater degree in larger populations, which is consistent with previous findings.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation inDrosophila melanogasterJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 2006
- The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflictPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overviewPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- FEMALE RESISTANCE TO MALE HARM EVOLVES IN RESPONSE TO MANIPULATION OF SEXUAL CONFLICTEvolution, 2004
- COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EVOLVING UNDER EXPERIMENTALLY ENFORCED POLYANDRY OR MONOGAMYEvolution, 2003
- The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflictNature, 2003
- Harm to females increases with male body size inDrosophila melanogasterProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2002
- Sexual conflict and speciationPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolutionNature, 1996
- Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland productsNature, 1995