Surgery for congenital heart conditions in Oxford
- 10 February 2005
- Vol. 330 (7487) , 319-320
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7487.319
Abstract
New report shows that Oxford's mortality is in the middle of the national range T he NHS in the United Kingdom fears another “Bristol,” where preventable or excess adverse outcomes may go undetected and unresolved for a prolonged period. In Bristol, reports of excessive surgical mortality among children having heart surgery in the early 1990s led to an independent public inquiry, which concluded that the mortality in children younger than 1 year who were having open cardiac surgery was unacceptably high.1 In October 2004 the BMJ published an article saying that similar problems may be emerging in relation to surgery for congenital heart disease in Oxford.2 Is this really the case? The Bristol Royal Infirmary inquiry had explored several sources of data that may have detected this inferior performance, and all were found deficient in one way or another. The UK cardiac surgical register run by the Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons was not only anonymised, but it was based on diagnosis rather than operation and so could not detect differences in outcome where more than one operation existed to treat a single diagnosis. Hospital episode statistics, compiled from routine administrative data, were also not designed …Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paediatric cardiac surgical mortality in England after Bristol: descriptive analysis of hospital episode statistics 1991-2002BMJ, 2004
- Survival after surgery or therapeutic catheterisation for congenital heart disease in children in the United Kingdom: analysis of the central cardiac audit database for 2000-1BMJ, 2004
- Comparison of UK paediatric cardiac surgical performance by analysis of routinely collected data 1984–96: was Bristol an outlier?The Lancet, 2001