The in vivo significance of antibiotic-induced endotoxin release in experimental Gram-negative sepsis
Open Access
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Innate Immunity
- Vol. 3 (3) , 245-252
- https://doi.org/10.1177/096805199600300310
Abstract
Considerable evidence now supports the experimental findings that penicillin-binding protein (PBP)-2 specific antimicrobial agents such as imipenem generate less endotoxin than PBP-3 specific agents such as ceftazidime during the process of bacteriolysis of Gram-negative bacteria. To determine if differences in endotoxin release have pathophysiologic significance in vivo, Sprague-Dawley rats were experimentally challenged with intraperitoneal injections of virulent, serum-resistant clinical strains of the following Gram-negative bacilli: Escherichia coli 018:K1, Klebsiella pneumoniae K2, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 12.4.4 (immuno type 6). After intravenous administration of imipenem (25 mg/kg), ceftazidime (50 mg/kg) or saline control, imipenem and ceftazidime-treated animals had rapid reductions in the quantitative level of bacteremia from all three pathogens. Peritoneal fluid samples revealed spherical forms with imipenem and long, filamentous forms with ceftazidime. Circulating plasma endotoxin levels were consistently higher ( P < 0.05) with ceftazidime than imipenem for 6 h after administration of E. coli or P. aeruginosa intraperitoneal challenge. Endotoxin levels were unchanged to slightly higher with imipenem than ceftazidime following K. pneumoniae intraperitoneal challenge. TNF levels peaked 2 h post-therapy and were consistently higher with ceftazidime-treated animals ( P < 0.05). D-galactosamine-treated animals had LD50 values that were 0.5-2 log higher ( P < 0.001) with imipenem for E. coli and P. aeruginosa but did not differ from ceftazidime in animals challenged with the K. pneumoniae strain. These results indicate that the PBP-2 specific agent imipenem led to significantly less endotoxin release than did ceftazidime with its great affinity to PBP-3. Differential endotoxin release was found after antimicrobial therapy with the E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains but not with the K. pneumoniae strain tested in this study. The clinical relevance of these findings with treatment of systemic Gram-negative infections in humans will require further clinical investigation.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relative concentrations of endotoxin-binding proteins in body fluids during infectionThe Lancet, 1994
- Effect of antibiotics on endotoxin release from gram-negative bacteriaDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1993
- Antibiotic-Induced Release of Endotoxin: A ReappraisalClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- ss-Lactam Antibiotic-Induced Release of Free Endotoxin: In Vitro Comparison of Penicillin-Binding Protein (PBP) 2-Specific Imipenem and PBP 3-Specific CeftazidimeThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Differences in Release of Tumor Necrosis Factor from THP-l Cells Stimulated by Filtrates of Antibiotic-Killed Escherichia coliThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Pretreatment with recombinant murine tumor necrosis factor alpha/cachectin and murine interleukin 1 alpha protects mice from lethal bacterial infection.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1989
- Serial Quantitation of Endotoxemia and Bacteremia During Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacterial SepsisThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1988
- Release of endotoxin from bacteria exposed to ciprofloxacin and its prevention with polymyxin BEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1986
- Role of Antibiotic Class in the Rate of Liberation of Endotoxin During Therapy for Experimental Gram-Negative Bacterial SepsisThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1985
- FRAPPER FORT OU FRAPPER DOUCEMENT: A GRAM-NEGATIVE DILEMMAThe Lancet, 1978