Universal critical amplitude ratios for percolation
- 1 July 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review B
- Vol. 22 (1) , 400-414
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.22.400
Abstract
The hypothesis of universality implies that for every scaling relation among critical exponents there exists a universal ratio among the corresponding critical amplitudes. If one writes , , , and [where , being the concentration of nonzero bonds, and +(-) stands for ()] for the leading singular terms in the probability to belong to the infinite cluster, the mean number of clusters, the clusters' mean-square size, and the pair connectedness correlation length, then it is shown that the ratios , , , , and ( is the dimensionality) are universal. Similar quantities are found for the behavior at (as a function of a "ghost" field). All of these universal ratios are derived from a universal scaled equation of state, which is calculated to second order in . The (extrapolated) results are compared with available information in dimensionalities , with reasonable agreements. The amplitude relations become exact at , when logarithmic corrections appear. Additional universal ratios are obtained for the confluent correction to scaling terms.
Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Scaling theory of percolation clustersPhysics Reports, 1979
- Universal relations among thermodynamic critical amplitudesPhysical Review B, 1976
- Two-scale-factor universality and the renormalization groupPhysical Review B, 1976
- Percolation problems and the Potts modelPhysics Letters A, 1976
- Renormalization-Group Approach to Percolation ProblemsPhysical Review Letters, 1975
- On the random-cluster modelPhysica, 1972
- On the random-cluster model II. The percolation modelPhysica, 1972
- On the random-cluster modelPhysica, 1972
- An introduction to percolation theoryAdvances in Physics, 1971
- Some generalized order-disorder transformationsMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1952