Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated
- 30 June 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 59 (6) , 559.e1-559.e9
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- CUGE: A SCREENING INSTRUMENT FOR ALCOHOL ABUSE AND DEPENDENCE IN STUDENTSAlcohol and Alcoholism, 2004
- Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional studyPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- External validation is necessary in prediction research:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Internal and external validation of predictive models: A simulation study of bias and precision in small samplesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: The architecture of diagnostic researchBMJ, 2002
- Internal validation of predictive modelsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 2000
- The Value of CAGE, CUGE, and AUDIT in Screening for Alcohol Abuse and Dependence Among College FreshmenAlcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research, 2000
- The Diagnostic Value of Scoring Models for Organic and Non-organic Gastrointestinal Disease, Including the Irritable-bowel SyndromeMedical Decision Making, 1994
- Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1987