Learning complex computer programs
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Behaviour & Information Technology
- Vol. 5 (3) , 217-225
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01449298608914515
Abstract
The nature of users' difficulties when learning either a data-base or a spread-sheet program is analysed here. Two subjects for each program were thinking aloud while following the instructions in a written tutorial. One main result was the large number of different difficulties, both procedural and conceptual, experienced by the subjects. A tentative conclusion is that it may not be possible to eliminate these difficulties by making only a small number of changes to the programs. In contrast to earlier studies, mistaken analogies were not a major source of difficulties; for example, the typewriter analogy contributed only to a very small extent. The analyses showed that subjects had more difficulties on the main command level than on the sub-command level. Despite the small number of subjects, a large variation in learning strategy was observed.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blocking Learner Error States in a Training-Wheels SystemHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1984
- Learning text editor semantics by analogyPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1983
- Learning to use a text processing systemPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1982
- Analogy considered harmfulPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1982