Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Contraception
- Vol. 72 (3) , 168-174
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2005.03.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Superior cycle control with a contraceptive vaginal ring compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 μg ethinylestradiol and 150 μg levonorgestrel: a randomized trialHuman Reproduction, 2005
- Efficacy, cycle control, and user acceptability of a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ringObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Comparison of cycle control with a combined contraceptive vaginal ring and oral levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiolAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Pharmacokinetics of a contraceptive patch (Evra™/Ortho Evra™) containing norelgestromin and ethinyloestradiol at four application sitesBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2002
- Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of a contraceptive patch in healthy women participantsContraception, 2001
- Efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a novel contraceptive vaginal ring releasing etonogestrel and ethinyl oestradiolHuman Reproduction, 2001
- Pharmacokinetics of Etonogestrel and Ethinylestradiol Released from a Combined Contraceptive Vaginal RingClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2000
- Ziprasidone and the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptiveBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2000
- The Combined Oral Contraceptive Risks and Adverse Effects in PerspectiveDrug Safety, 1995
- Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol in 9 women who received a low-dose oral contraceptive over a treatment period of 3 months and, after a wash-out phase, a single oral administration of the same contraceptive formulationContraception, 1992