Coastal zone management in British Columbia: An institutional comparison with Washington, Oregon, and California
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Coastal Management
- Vol. 18 (2) , 115-141
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08920759009362105
Abstract
The basis for coastal zone management in the United States is established in legislation. In comparison, Canadian federal and provincial governments have adopted a piecemeal approach for managing a variety of concerns examined here: water quality, ecological protection, public access, aesthetics, natural hazards, and water dependency. As a result of this approach, which is characterized by a minimum of federal, provincial, and interjurisdictional coordination, the British Columbia coastal zone is showing signs of stress. For example, major shellfish harvesting areas are being lost to water pollution; ecologically sensitive habitats are being consumed by urban, commercial, and industrial expansion; recreation and tourism opportunities are being impaired by clear cutting and other inappropriate developments; and infrastructure is allowed in flood and erosion‐prone areas. Recommendations to improve the approach to coastal management in British Columbia include a variety of innovations. New federal and provincial policies, legislation, institutions, and experimentation with local and regional integrated resource planning are required to better govern the coastal zone. Increased support for existing agencies, public involvement, and access to information as well as more common use of environmental impact studies are needed to justify proposed coastal developments.Keywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- The U.S. national coastal zone management program—problems and opportunities in the next phaseCoastal Management, 1987