Comparison of Three International Methods with APHA Method for Enumeration of Escherichia coli in Estuarine Waters and Shellfish
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Food Protection
- Vol. 47 (7) , 557-561
- https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-47.7.557
Abstract
Three international methods were evaluated for enumerating Escherichia coli in estuarine waters, oysters (Crassostrea virginica), mussels (Mytilus edilus) and clams (Mercenaria mercenaria). Results of the French most probable number (MPN) method, a modification of the MacKenzie, Taylor and Gilbert (1948) method, were obtained within 48 h and compared favorably with those obtained by the standard American Public Health Association (APHA) MPN procedure in all sample types. Results of the Australian Anderson and Baird-Parker plate count method, obtained within 24 h, were significantly lower than those obtained with the standard APHA procedure for all sample types. Results of the British roll tube method, a 24-h direct count method, compared favorably with the standard APHA procedure only for mussels and waters.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of membrane filter methods for enumeration of faecal coliforms from marine waterMarine Environmental Research, 1980
- Comparison of Two Rapid Test Procedures with the Standard EC Test for Recovery of Fecal Coliform Bacteria from Shellfish-Growing WatersJournal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 1978