Measuring the Predictable Variation in Stock and Bond Returns
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 10 (3) , 579-630
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.3.579
Abstract
Recent studies show that when a regression model is used to forecast stock and bond returns, the sample $$R^2$$ increases dramatically with the length of the return horizon. These studies argue, therefore, that long-horizon returns are highly predictable. This article presents evidence that suggests otherwise. Long-horizon regressions can easily yield large values of the sample $$R^2,$$ even if the populations $$R^2$$ is smaller or zero. Moreover, long-horizon regressions with a small or zero population $$R^2$$ can produce t-ratios that might be interpreted as evidence of strong predictability. In general, the analysis provides little support for the view that long-horizon returns are highly predictable.
Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Asset returns and inflationPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Mean reversion in stock prices: Evidence and ImplicationsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Stock returns and the term structurePublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Assessing Goodness-Of-Fit of Asset Pricing Models: The Distribution of the Maximal R 2The Journal of Finance, 1997
- A Longer Look at Dividend YieldsThe Journal of Business, 1995
- Predictable Stock Returns: The Role of Small Sample BiasThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Testing the Predictive Power of Dividend YieldsThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Drawing inferences from statistics based on multiyear asset returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 1989
- Expected stock returns and volatilityJournal of Financial Economics, 1987
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980