The “Zavada hypothesis”: a rebuttal rebutted
- 1 November 1991
- Vol. 40 (4) , 583-595
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1222766
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- CORRELATIONS BETWEEN POLLEN EXINE SCULPTURING AND ANGIOSPERM SELF‐INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEMS—A REBUTTALTaxon, 1990
- The Role of Self-Incompatibility and Sexual Selection in the Gymnosperm-Angiosperm Transition: A HypothesisThe American Naturalist, 1986
- Do homomorphic and heteromorphic self-incompatibility systems have the same sporophytic mechanism?Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 1986
- Gametophytic self-incompatibility re-examined: a replyHeredity, 1985
- The relation between pollen exine sculpturing and self-incompatibility mechanismsÖsterreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 1984
- Genetics of incompatibility inCorylus avellana L.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1979
- The genetics of self-incompatibility in Papaver rhoeasProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1975
- Heterostyly in the Connaraceae with Special Reference to Byrsocarpus coccineusBotanical Gazette, 1962
- The evolution of incompatibility in species of ŒnotheraHeredity, 1955
- Incompatibility in Cosmos bipinnatusHeredity, 1954