Angina pectoris by Rose questionnaire does not predict cardiovascular disease in treated hypertensive patients

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
To determine the predictive value of angina pectoris diagnosed by Rose questionnaire for cardiovascular disease among treated hypertensives. The cardiovascular experience of 4093 patients who had no history of cardiovascular disease and had been administered the Rose questionnaire for angina in a worksite treatment program was evaluated. Among 2659 men and 1434 women of similar age (53 versus 54 years), the race distribution was 44 versus 31% whites, 27 versus 41% blacks and 29 versus 28% Hispanics. Overall, the prevalence of angina by Rose questionnaire in women (15%) was twice that in men (7%) in all three races, with Hispanics having the highest (20 versus 10%) prevalence. Those with angina (Rose-plus) and those without (Rose-minus) had similar initial and final blood pressures. In 4.0 years of average follow-up study, the crude incidence rates (per 1000 person-years) of the recorded 120 myocardial infarctions and 35 strokes did not differ significantly between Rose-plus and Rose-minus patients, except for myocardial infarction in Hispanic men (20.5 versus 5.9). When myocardial infarction incidence was adjusted for age within each sex-race subgroup, only Rose-plus Hispanic men had a significantly greater relative risk with Rose-minus as referent (relative risk 3.13, 95% confidence interval 1.31-7.50). Overall, in the Cox proportional hazards regression model, angina by Rose questionnaire was not predictive of myocardial infarction after accounting for other recognized risk factors. The present data suggest that the Rose questionnaire as a diagnostic tool for angina is not predictive of subsequent clinical events among treated hypertensive patients.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: