HLA Matching in Renal Transplantation
- 22 September 1994
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 331 (12) , 803-805
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199409223311210
Abstract
The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) was discovered and so named because of its association with allograft rejection in animals. Thus, when kidney transplantation in humans became a reality it was not surprising that the degree of matching of organ donors and recipients for the antigens of the human MHC (HLA antigens) strongly predicted the probability of graft acceptance. The initial experience with kidney transplantation, which involved living related donors, demonstrated that the number of shared HLA chromosomal segments (haplotypes) predicted the outcome and the degree of immunosuppressive therapy required. Likewise, in 1966 Terasaki and coworkers reported an association between HLA . . .Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of HLA Mismatches on the Survival of First Cadaveric Kidney TransplantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Equitable Allocation of HLA-Compatible Kidneys for Local Pools and for MinoritiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A PROPOSAL FOR IMPROVED CADAVER KIDNEY ALLOCATION1Transplantation, 1993
- Factors affecting the waiting time of cadaveric kidney transplant candidates in the United StatesJAMA, 1992
- The Effect of Race on Access and Outcome in TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- THE EFFECT OF FIRST CADAVER RENAL TRANSPLANT HLA-A, B MATCH ON SENSITIZATION LEVELS AND RETRANSPLANT RATES FOLLOWING GRAFT FAILURETransplantation, 1987
- THE EFFECT OF HLA-A, -B MATCHING ON CADAVER RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION COMPARING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPECIFICITIESTransplantation, 1984
- Benefits of HLA-A and HLA-B Matching on Graft and Patient Outcome after Cadaveric-Donor Renal TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- SEROTYPING FOR HOMOTRANSPLANTATION. VII. SELECTION OF KIDNEY DONORS FOR THIRTY‐TWO RECIPIENTS*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1966