Agism as explanation for sexism in provision of thrombolysis
- 3 September 1994
- Vol. 309 (6954) , 573
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.573
Abstract
As part of the Royal College of General Practitioners' myocardial infarction study, 776 general practitioners in Britain supplied information about the management (including the use of thrombolysis) of 2495 patients suspected of having a myocardial infarction. The patients were recruited from March 1991 to September 1992. We examined the use of thrombolysis in hospital among the 1094 patients who had a myocardial infarction that had been confirmed by a hospital and who had no contraindication to thrombolysis.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Save the normal foreskin.BMJ, 1993
- The Influence of Age on Policies for Admission and Thrombolysis in Coronary Care Units in the United KingdomAge and Ageing, 1992
- Sex Differences in the Management of Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Differences in the Use of Procedures between Women and Men Hospitalized for Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991