An examination of the New York mandatory seat belt law on a university campus.
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 11 (1) , 63-67
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044840
Abstract
On January 1, 1985, the mandatory seat belt law went into effect in New York State; violators were now subject to a fine of $50.00. Police officers issued nonpenalty-based warnings during the month prior to the law's imposition. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of the warning versus the fine and a fine-plus-prompt condition (the prompt delivered by the experimenters) on seat belt use on a university campus. Results indicated that significantly more drivers used their sear belts during the fine conditions as compared with the warning condition and that significantly more female drivers used their seat belt during all conditions. A significant difference was not found, however, between the fine and fine-plus-prompt conditions.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effectiveness of the Canadian mandatory seat belt use lawsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1984
- A Probabilistic Analysis of the Passive-Restraint QuestionRisk Analysis, 1984
- Mandatory Belt Use and Driver Risk TakingRisk Analysis, 1984
- REWARDING SAFETY BELT USAGE AT AN INDUSTRIAL SETTING: TESTS OF TREATMENT GENERALITY AND RESPONSE MAINTENANCEJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1983
- A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS OF INCENTIVE PROMPTS FOR MOTIVATING SEAT BELT USEJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1982
- A controlled study of the effect of television messages on safety belt use.American Journal of Public Health, 1974