Anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section
- 30 April 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 97 (5) , 420-424
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb01829.x
Abstract
Summary. The Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales 1982–84 (Department of Health 1989) recommends early involvement of the anaesthetist in women having emergency caesarean sections and the use of epidural anaesthesia in preference to general anaesthesia. In an observational prospective study the need for emergency abdominal delivery could be anticipated in 87% of 360 consecutive emergency caesarean sections. Early establishment of epidural analgesia allowed extension, to an appropriate level for the surgery, in 70%. The duty anaesthetist accompanying the obstetric team on three wardrounds a day could be forewarned of anticipated problems in most women who are eventually delivered abdominally.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of spinal versus epidural anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine on lower limb blood flowActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1987
- FETAL-NEONATAL STATUS FOLLOWING CAESAREAN SECTION FOR FETAL DISTRESSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1984
- ANAESTHETIC MORBIDITY FOLLOWING CAESAREAN SECTION UNDER EPIDURAL OR GENERAL ANAESTHESIAThe Lancet, 1984
- Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants.BMJ, 1983
- Anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The potential for regional blockAnaesthesia, 1982
- EditorialAnaesthesia, 1982
- A survey of anaesthetic misadventuresAnaesthesia, 1981
- Effect of Epidural Versus General Anaesthesia on Calf Blood FlowActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1980
- Preventable Anesthesia MishapsAnesthesiology, 1978