A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta‐analysis
- 26 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 26 (25) , 4531-4543
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2883
Abstract
The random effects approach in meta‐analysis due to DerSimonian and Laird is well established and used pervasively. It has been established by Brockwell and Gordon that this method, when used for confidence intervals, leads to coverage probabilities lower than the nominal value. A number of alternatives have been proposed, but these either have the defect of iterative and complicated calculation, or deficient coverage. In this paper we propose a new approach, which is simple to use, and has coverage probabilities better than the alternatives, based on extensive simulation. We call this approach the ‘quantile approximation’ method. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aneuploidy and prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of published dataBritish Journal of Cancer, 2001
- A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Association of Fibrinogen, C-reactive Protein, Albumin, or Leukocyte Count With Coronary Heart DiseaseJAMA, 1998
- Short-term Effects of Ambient Oxidant Exposure on Mortality: A Combined Analysis within the APHEA ProjectAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Misleading meta-analysisBMJ, 1995
- Magnesium in acute myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1995
- THE IMPACT OF METHOD CHOICE ON META‐ANALYSISAustralian Journal of Statistics, 1995
- Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysisStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1993
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- ON ESTIMATING THE RELATION BETWEEN BLOOD GROUP AND DISEASEAnnals of Human Genetics, 1955