Cultural rationalities in crisis sensemaking: a study of a public inquiry into a major industrial accident
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Industrial Crisis Quarterly
- Vol. 4 (1) , 27-48
- https://doi.org/10.1177/108602669000400102
Abstract
This paper investigates the sensemaking which occurred during a public in quiry into a fatal gas pipeline accident. The research conceives of the public inquiry as an important stage in crises, and investigates the role of multiple perspectives and rationalities in crisis sensemaking. Stakeholders at the in quiry are shown to differ in terms of their social organization, the cultural biases they hold, and the interpretations they make of events and risks. The paper extends the multiple perspectives approach to crises by linking this approach to theoretical developments in cultural analysis, and by showing the implica tions multiple perspectives have for inquiry and crisis stakeholders.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- UNDERSTANDING INDUSTRIAL CRISES[1]Journal of Management Studies, 1988
- POST‐BHOPAL BEHAVIOUR AT A CHEMICAL COMPANYJournal of Management Studies, 1988
- RISK REPORTING AND THE MANAGEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL CRISESJournal of Management Studies, 1988
- JUDICIAL GATEKEEPING IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS TECHNOLOGIESJournal of Management Studies, 1988
- Managing the Meaning of a Sour Gas Well Blowout: The Public Culture of Organizational DisastersIndustrial Crisis Quarterly, 1988
- The Government's Role As Stakeholder In Industrial CrisesIndustrial Crisis Quarterly, 1987
- Crisis CommunicationsIndustrial Crisis Quarterly, 1987
- Making Sense of Organizationally Based Environmental DisastersJournal of Management, 1984
- The Codes of the DeadUrban Life, 1983
- On Last ResortsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981